Showing posts with label science. Show all posts
Showing posts with label science. Show all posts

Sunday, July 29, 2018

JULY 4th GIVEAWAY WINNER!!!



I'd like to announce the winner
of my July 4th Giveaway!!

And the winner is....

Brian @ Babbling Books!!

He has already claimed his prize!


https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2666176-i-am-a-strange-loop






This book sounds SO fascinating, I bought myself a copy, too! Since it's nonfiction, I will be reviewing it on 
my other blog, though.

A HUGE "thank you" to everyone
who entered this giveaway!
Please stay tuned, as I'm holding
giveaways ALL the time, whether
my own, for a blog tour, or 
as part of a giveaway blog hop!!







 

Monday, April 27, 2015

Book Review: The Spontaneous Healing of Belief, by Gregg Braden


The Spontaneous Healing of Belief: Shattering the Paradigm of False Limits
Gregg Braden
Trade Paperback, 217 pages
Hay House, Inc.
April 1, 2008
Metaphysics, New Age, Nonfiction, Philosophy, Psychology, Self-Help, Science, Spirituality
Source: Purchased from Barnes & Noble


Book Synopsis What would it mean to discover that everything from the DNA of life, to the future of our world, is based upon a simple Reality Code—one that we can change and upgrade by choice? New revelations in physics and biology suggest that we’re about to find out!

A growing body of scientific evidence suggests that our universe works like a Consciousness Computer. Rather than the number codes of typical software, our Consciousness Computer uses a language that we all have, yet are only beginning to understand. Life’s reality code is based in the language of human emotion and focused belief. Knowing that belief is our reality-maker, the way we think of ourselves and our world is now more important than ever!

For us to change the beliefs that have led to war, disease, and the failed careers and relationships of our past we need a reason to see things differently. Our ancestors used miracles to change what they believed. Today we use science. The Spontaneous Healing of Belief offers us both: the miracles that open the door to a powerful new way of seeing the world, and the science that tells us why the miracles are possible, revealing: why we are not limited by the “laws” of physics and biology as we know them today 

Once we become aware of the paradigm-shattering discoveries and true-life miracles, we must think of ourselves differently. And that difference is where the spontaneous healing of belief begins.



https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2263714.The_Spontaneous_Healing_of_Belief
 





Braden is a very well-known figure in New Age circles, as well as beyond. He's certainly a very engaging writer, with a smoothly flowing prose style, as well as fascinating insights, which he backs up with scientific data. Furthermore, this book is very well-researched and annotated.

I have discovered, however, that books in the New Age category do not completely satisfy me. While their philosophical views are frequently innovative and interesting, there's always something in these books that gives me pause, that conflicts with my Christian values, no matter how open-minded I might want to be. Furthermore, if one wants to leave religious values aside, these books also conflict with rational values, at times.

I am still interested in reading such books, however, because there's much food for thought in them. Depending on a reader's religious and/or philosophical views, I would advise proceeding with intellectual caution.

Braden follows a pattern laid down by other New Age authors in years past -- using science as validation for New Age philosophy. Fritjof Capra, the Austrian-born American physicist, was probably one of the first to do this, with his The Tao of Physics, published in 1975. Another example is Migene Gonzalez-Wippler, the Puerto Rican cultural anthropologist, with the book A Kabbalah for the Modern World, first published in 1974, with subsequent revised editions. Both of these authors linked New Age philosophy to quantum physics. So does Braden. I can see why they have all made this connection, too, as quantum physics has been a revolution not only in science, but also in philosophy, which is necessarily affected by new scientific discoveries.

Braden's basic theme is that, as most New Agers say, it is our beliefs that shape our reality. Citing data from quantum research, he states that we, and everything around us, "are made of a shared field of energy that was scientifically recognized in the 20th century and is now identified by names that include the field, the quantum hologram, the mind of God, nature's mind, and the Divine Matrix." (Introduction, pg. xiii, quoting from Braden's The Divine Matrix: Bridging Space, Miracles, and Belief, pg. 54)

Elaborating on this, Braden gives a brief, simplified explanation of the world of quantum mechanics, in which energy can behave as either visible particles or invisible waves. He then proceeds to what seems like a logical conclusion: if energy, which our bodies are made of, can behave in what appear to be -- according to the laws of science -- miraculous ways, then we, too, can do the same. Although  this is admittedly an interesting, even exciting concept, I have to ask myself whether it holds up as a logical conclusion. Still, it does stimulate one to think about it.

Another of the concepts presented in this book is found in Chapter One, titled "A New View of Reality: the Universe as a Consciousness Computer". The idea of the universe as a thinking computer was originally put forth in the 1940s by Konrad Zuse, who developed the first computers. Braden interprets this to mean that "everything is information" (pg. 17), and the universe is really the product of a huge program that has been running for a very long time. If human beings can come to know the program's code, they will then know "the rules of reality itself". (pg. 18)

This chapter also discusses the idea that the universe is made up of patterns, as exemplified by fractals.

Chapter Two expands on the concept of the universe as a consciousness computer through a discussion of how this computer can be programmed. The method involves beliefs and feelings, according to Braden. A thought, he states, is just that -- a thought -- until it's energized by emotion to create a feeling. He defines a feeling as "the union of what we think with the fuel of our love or fear for our thought." He then proceeds to the conclusion that belief is a form of feeling. 

This chapter also includes a short discussion of the function of thoughts, wishes, affirmations, and prayers.

Chapters 5 and 6 deal with techniques for 'shattering the paradigm of false limits' and 'rewriting one's reality code'. Quite honestly, I haven't gotten to these chapters, as I have been unable to finish the book. I don't normally write a review for a book that I have not finished reading, but I felt it important to do so with this one.

It was Chapter 4 that changed everything for me. This chapter gets to the crux of the matter -- why I cannot accept New Age philosophy in its entirety. 

The chapter is titled, "What Do You Believe? The Great Question at the Core of Your Life".  This 'great question' does indeed strike at the core of everyone's life, but I totally disagree with the author's view of just how it does so. 

Ironically, Braden states, in the same chapter, something that I do believe is true, and he backs it up with medical data.  To quote: "Our beliefs about unresolved hurt can create physical effects with the power to damage and even kill us." (pg. 111) I have read this same thing elsewhere, and do agree with it. The heart is not just an organ that pumps blood; it is the seat of emotion. Every painful emotional event we undergo can and does have lasting physical effects, unless we learn to forgive, which is not an easy task at all. I'm glad that Braden raises this point here.

It's right after this, though, that Braden gets to the question I mentioned above, which is the following: "Do you believe that there is one source for everything that happens in the world, or do you believe that there are two opposite and opposing forces -- good and evil -- one that 'likes' you and one that doesn't?" (pg. 116) Braden's own answer points to a reconciliation or acceptance of both forces in life. He states that, when we see the world as a battleground, then life becomes a battle. According to him, this then affects us physically, as we therefore see the world as not being a safe place. Braden goes on to say that seeing life in terms of light and darkness, good and evil, means that we must see the world as a very scary place.  Instead, we should see the world as a wonderful, beautiful place in which to live. He also brings up the point that judging people in terms of light and darkness will affect all of our relationships.

While there might a be a grain of truth in everything the author brings up above, the idea of reconciling good and evil, light and darkness, in short, of going beyond this polarity, is what really bothers me. Braden himself recognizes that such an idea can be very shocking to some people. On page 128, he states the following: "It flies in the face of everything that they've ever been taught -- and may even sound like heresy!" That is precisely how I feel about this concept. 

Every Christian denomination, whether Catholic or Protestant, draws a very clear line between good and evil. There is no possible reconciliation between them. The Bible itself clearly demonstrates the difference between the two, although, ironically, God in the Old Testament does not always behave in ways consistent with a good and loving deity. Still, Christianity is founded on the basic idea that good and  evil are, indeed, locked in a battle that will only end with the second coming of Jesus Christ. 

Leaving religious beliefs aside, however, the concept of 'reconciling' light and darkness, good and evil, goes against reason, as well. It's very evident that the two cannot be blended, or joined together, in any way. While there may be gray areas at times, there are, for the most part, very firm boundaries between the two forces. This is logical, and evident to any reasoning mind. 

As i skimmed through this book in order to refresh my memory before writing my review, I also realized that Braden's mentioning of the universe as a thinking computer, which can be programmed through our beliefs and intentions, coupled with strong emotions, entirely leaves out the idea of a personal God. Of course, those who are not theists or even deists will not be troubled by this at all. As a matter of fact, I do think that I might need to dwell on this further, as the fact of consciousness being present obviously indicates the existence of some type of being. Braden doesn't make it quite clear whether this 'consciousness' is merely the material universe, or whether it is an immanent deity that might also be construed as transcendent.

This is obviously a rather deep book, in spite of its easy-to-read, elegant style, so i need to go back to it and read it more slowly, carefully analyzing it as I go along. Therefore, I might return with a second review of it. However, I'm sure, as of this writing, that I won't be changing my mind in regards to the question of 'reconciling' good and evil.

In spite of my strong religious and rational reservations about this book, I have given it four stars, because Braden successfully engages the reader on very interesting topics that do bear some thinking and investigation. He is anything but boring, and is able to present even the most seemingly outrageous topics in a way that will not get him classified as being 'fringe' or 'wacky' in any way.

For those who share my own reservations, this might prove to be a reading experience that will leave them with some mixed feelings about the book, as has been the case with me. Still, I do think it's an intellectually stimulating book, well worth the read.


MY RATING:








New York Times best-selling author Gregg Braden is internationally renowned as a pioneer in bridging science and spirituality. Following a successful career as a Computer Geologist for Phillips Petroleum during the 1970s energy crisis, he became a Senior Computer Systems Designer for Martin Marietta Defense Systems during the last year of the Cold War. In 1991 he was appointed the first Technical Operations Manager for Cisco Systems where he led the development of the global support team that assures the reliability of today’s Internet. For more than 22 years, Gregg has searched high mountain villages, remote monasteries, and forgotten texts to uncover their timeless secrets. To date, his work has led to such paradigm-shattering books as The Isaiah Effect, The God Code, The Divine Matrix and his 2008 release, The Spontaneous Healing of Belief: Shattering the Paradigm of False Limits. Gregg’s work is now published in 17 languages and 27 countries and shows us beyond any reasonable doubt that the key to our future lies in the wisdom of our past.

Website/Goodreads/Amazon/Facebook /Twitter



 


Sunday, March 16, 2014

Blog Tour: Book Review/Giveaway!! Antiphony, by Chris Katsaropoulos



http://www.novelpublicity.com/luminis-3/


Welcome to this stop in the
sponsored by

Three books are featured in
this tour, and I have
chosen to review Antiphony.
Click on the button above
for a list of all 
participating blogs, as 
well as information about
the other books and
their authors.


About the Book



Antiphony
Chris Katsaropoulos
Trade Paperback, 206 pages
Luminis Books, Inc
November 1, 2011
Literary Fiction, Philosophy, Religion, Science, Spirituality



Book Synopsis Theodore Reveil, one of the leading lights in String Theory physics, is on his way to present his latest research at a triumphant meeting of his colleagues from around the world, when he realizes he has lost the notes for his presentation.  At the podium, in the midst of his distraction and confusion, he poses the question: "What if the universe, instead of being a giant machine, is really a giant thought?"  Then he crosses a line which he can never step back over again, saying, "The infinities and singularities in these equations may be telling us that what we are missing is unknowable in terms of physical science. These unsolvable terms in our equations may be roadsigns pointing to consciousness -- to God -- as the missing piece of the puzzle."  Antiphony traces the downward spiral of Theodore's career in the wake of what he has said, and the remarkable transformation that leads him into the depths of madness....or the revelation of the Final Theory, the ultimate secret of the universe.



My Review

The very first sentence of this novel was a sheer delight to read, and I was instantly immersed in the uniquely poetic, wonderfully idiosyncratic world of Theodore Reveil, theoretical physicist.  Here's the sentence that so delighted me: "Theodore sees now that he should have brought sunglasses, for even here, within the gaping, hushed volume of the convention hotel lobby, splinters of irretrievable light reach through the wall of glass that defines the reception area and make him squint, as he tries to focus on what his wife is telling him."  With this very first sentence, Katsaropoulos sets the tone for the entire novel.  There is an age-old conflict here, deeper than the novel's surface conflict.  This underlying conflict is between a superficial view of so-called "reality" -- that which we perceive with our five senses -- and reality as seen by the poet, the mystic.  

Theodore is indeed a poet and mystic.  This only begins to become apparent to him when, having lost his notes for an important scientific presentation, he first experiences the stirrings of awareness of that numinous world underlying the one perceived only by the senses.  The reader, however, already knows that Theodore is no ordinary scientist, just from reading that first sentence of Chapter One.  Theodore realizes that he should have brought sunglasses with him.  This is an obviously practical observation, belonging to the world of consensual reality.  He then perceives "the gaping, hushed volume of the reception lobby", as "the splinters of irretrievable light reach through the wall of glass".  This perception is a poetic, as well as mystical, one.

This conflict between the perception of "ordinary" and "mystical" reality, for me, is what makes Antiphony such a powerful literary and artistic statement.  The title, aside from its meaning as "responsive alternation of two groups, especially of singers" (Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary) can also be read as "anti-phony", which I think refers to Theodore's inability to accept what society at large holds as true: that consensual, "common-sense" reality is the only reality there is.  However, those who, like Theodore, have experienced the call of that mysterious, spiritual world, will agree that it does exist.  Children, for instance, are very much aware of this reality, and I think that's the reason Katsaropoulos chose to identify his protagonist as "Theodore", instead of "Dr. Reveil", throughout the novel.  Theodore is childlike in several ways, but the most important one is in his sense of wonder at the behavior of molecules, atoms, galaxies, and, indeed, the whole universe.  

Contrasted with Theodore's open, wondering capacity is his wife's complete unawareness of anything but consensual reality.  In fact, at the beginning of the novel, she prefers going to a spa to attending her husband's presentation, on the grounds that she will not understand most, or all, of what he will talk about during the event.  Ilene is the typical ordinary person who never wonders, never ponders, never questions the foundations of this so-called "reality".  So, of course, she and Theodore never really connect, whether on a spiritual, emotional, or intellectual level.  This made me wonder why he ever married her.  It also made me dislike her, even as I realized that she couldn't help being the way she was. 

I'm wondering if perhaps the author sees Theodore's wife as the archetype of Woman, totally immersed in a reality of the senses, one that she does not question or wonder about.  If I'm right in this assessment, then I must disagree with such a view of the female gender, as there are plenty of intellectual women who have also been great poets, scientists, artists, and indeed, have questioned and wondered at reality just as much as men have.

I suppose Ilene's presence in the novel was necessary, however, in order to emphasize the difference between the two perceptions of reality.  Thus, I am reminded of Hermann Hesse's Steppenwolf, in which the protagonist, Harry Haller, an intellectual, battles against his instinctual side, and later meets a woman, Hermine, who exemplifies the life of the senses.  Although the conflict in Hesse's novel is of another order entirely, this author, too, contrasts a man involved in an inner, very personal conflict, with a woman who is simply content to experience, to go along with the flow of life.

In all fairness to Ilene, I should also mention that, in the midst of all his mystical visions and endless theorizing about the true nature of reality, consciousness, and the universe, Theodore does seem to lose sight of his wife as a person in her own right.  Even though he and Ilene are not really compatible, he could at least have made some effort to connect with her in some way.  But then, so should Ilene have made her own efforts to connect with her husband.  Thus, aside from the central themes, Katsaropoulos also presents the scenario of a marriage that has settled into a rather monotonous routine, with little to no communication, on any level, between the two people involved.  This aspect of the novel, in conjunction with its main themes, lend it a definite air of melancholy, and even despair. 

Literary fiction, as opposed to genre fiction, does not necessarily rely upon plot twists and turns, or relentless action, in order to grab a reader's attention, and pull him/her along as the plot develops.  This novel is a case in point.  Rather than twists or turns, or mad chases to save the world from a villain or villains, the narrative mesmerizes the reader with its brilliant strangeness, its detailed description of seemingly trivial, ordinary events and objects that becomes a luminous landscape of great beauty.  Even in those passages full of what amounts to pure gibberish, the author succeeds in holding the reader's attention.  At least, that was very true in my own case. 

The book shifts from one reality to the other, as the plot, which takes place within a short period of only three days, develops.  The plot is, in fact, an antiphony, as the two perceptions of reality come to the forefront, merge, then separate, never entirely blending, yet somehow, never entirely separating, either. 

There are a couple of other drawbacks I also need to mention.  For me,  the novel's surface conflict -- that of a scientist disgraced because of his assertion that the universe is really a giant thought, and that the Final Theory of Everything points to the existence of God -- fell completely flat.  This idea is nothing new; in fact, it was first proposed by Sir James Jeans, a British astrophysicist, in his The Mysterious Universe, published in 1930.  Furthermore, this idea has become increasingly accepted by the scientific community, especially since the 20th-century developments in quantum mechanics, which have revealed the astounding fact that subatomic particles seem to have intention, and that the presence of an observer can alter the outcome of a scientific experiment.  In light of all this, I feel that the surface conflict in this novel loses much of its dramatic impact.  Theodore need not have been made to feel that he had overstepped his bounds as a scientist, since there are scientists today who share his perception of the universe as a mysterious, mystical, as well as beautiful, reality, ultimately grounded in the existence of an omnipotent Creator.

Another, more minor point I found objectionable was the author's detailed description of Theodore's activities in the men's restroom of the hotel.  In other parts of the novel, Katsaropoulos's vividly minute dissection of "ordinary" reality is beautiful in the extreme, and totally captivated me.  I cannot say the same for this restroom passage; indeed, I found it very disgusting, and feel it detracts from the overall, luminous picture presented in the novel.

In spite of the above objections, I greatly enjoyed Antiphony, and definitely recommend it as a captivating look into the mind and soul of a scientific genius who was also a poet and mystic.  Sadly, such people are, for the most part, not seen as valuable in this world of petty, mundane concerns.  Katsaropoulos has brilliantly succeeded in making this clear.

This novel does have a definite air of melancholy to it, as I mentioned above.  Theodore's inner visions and tensions with the outer, scientific community of the research organization he works for, as well as the disconnection from his wife, on all levels, affected me emotionally; I had to put the novel down at times, take a little break, and then return to it.  This was despite the fact that I found it very compelling reading. 

The novel features a deceptively simple interweaving of several distinct, yet interrelated themes; this is precisely one of the things that make it such a fascinating read.  At the deepest level, I believe it can be seen as "a wake-up call" for all of us who become so busy surviving, we forget that there's a whole world of beauty to be discovered in this "reality" we believe to be the only possible one.  At another level, the author seems to be saying that the ascent into poetic mysticism may irrevocably lead to madness, and thus, perhaps such insights are really incompatible with the world as commonly known.  Thus, the novel's message seems to simply underscore the deep paradoxes inherent in existence, as well as consciousness itself.
       

MY RATING:





https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/12275189-antiphony?ac=1








About the Author

Chris Katsaropoulos is the author of more than a dozen titles, including two novels, Fragile and Antiphony, from Luminis Books.  He has traveled extensively in Europe and North America, and enjoys collecting music and books.  His collection of poetry, Complete Knowing, published by Luminis Books, is coming in Fall, 2014.




 Online Links





 
 Be sure to enter the fabulous 
Novel Publicity Book Tours giveaway!!
You could win either of two $25 Amazon
gift cards, or an autographed copy
of one of the three featured books!!
One random commenter during
this tour will win one of the Amazon cards,
while the other will be given out
through the Rafflecopter.
Visit more blogs for more chances to win!
Good luck to everyone!!