This is an exciting event, hosted by
Lisa @ Dear Geek Place
and imyril @ onemore.org!!
For more information, and to
join in, please refer
to my Announcement Post
for this event!!
For more information, and to
join in, please refer
to my Announcement Post
for this event!!
(Star Trek Adventures, Book 1)
James Blish
Mass Market Paperback,
118 pages
Bantam Books,
February 1, 1972
Science Fiction, Star Trek TOS
Synopsis: When a transporter experiment goes horribly awry, suddenly there are two Mr. Spocks! One is the true First Officer of the Enterprise. The other is his complete opposite, a traitor whose very existence poses a grave threat to the crew, the ship, and the Federation itself. One of the Spocks must die. But which one ... ?
The original Star Trek TV show remains, for me, the very best of all the various incarnations of this great, pioneering SF series. As for the characters on this show, my very favorite is Mr. Spock, that enigmatic Vulcan whose personality is actually a combination of Terran and Vulcan traits.
Star Trek
has always appealed to me not only because of the highly compelling
characters and imaginative plots, but also because of the philosophical
aspects included in most of its episodes (with the exception of the truly
bad ones, such as "Mudd's Angels"). Blish certainly makes use of these aspects in this short novel.
The concept that forms the basis of the novel is one that has also been featured on the show itself, in more than one episode. The most similar to the one in this novel is "The Enemy Within", in which Captain Kirk is replicated due to a transporter malfunction. In Spock Must Die!, it is Spock who is replicated, although the effect of this replication is totally different from Kirk's. Whereas Kirk was split into his good and evil sides, which then had to be brought back together to form one whole person, each of the two Spocks IS one whole person. Interestingly, however, one of them does turn out to be evil, and is the complete opposite of the real Mr. Spock. (This also reminds me of yet another episode, "Mirror, Mirror".)
The story opens with something that also frequently appeared on the original program: McCoy's philosophical ruminations on the possible effects of beaming a humanoid from one place to another. He wonders whether the person who emerges from the transporter at any given destination is really the same person who stepped into it at the originating location. He also speculates as to whether this person's soul has actually been lost in the process.
This is a fascinating line of reasoning, and Blish expands upon it through the characters and plot. McCoy's thoughts actually seem prophetic, as the Enterprise crew find themselves in need of initiating a transporter experiment in order to find out what has happened to the Organians and their planet, and just how the Klingons might be involved. (The Organians were first introduced in "Errand of Mercy".)
In this particular case, Mr. Scott, the Chief Engineer, comes up with the idea of using the transporter to beam a tachyon version of an Enterprise crew member to Organia, as the starship itself is not within beaming range of the planet. The reason for this is so as not to risk sending the actual person to Organia, thus protecting him or her from any harmful effects, due to the distance. Spock, as Science Officer, as well as First Officer, is chosen for this "mission".
According to the Wikipedia article on the subject, a tachyon is "a hypothetical particle that always moves faster than light." In this novel, tachyons are treated as real physical particles. In my honest opinion, this unfortunately presents the dilemma of how a "tachyon version" of a real person could be beamed anywhere. Wouldn't that be a contradiction in terms? How could such a version even exist in our universe? Wouldn't this "person" necessarily be in a different dimension, given that they are composed of particles that move faster than light, whereas we regular humans are not composed of such particles? This, I think, is a flaw in the author's reasoning.
Getting back to the story.....something goes terribly wrong with the transporter, and, when it is finally shut off, TWO Spocks have now emerged..... Again, I must wonder at even the fictional possibility of this occurring, given that one of these Spocks is made up of these tachyons....
Although the idea of a transporter malfunction is not a new one in the original ST series (I don't know about the other versions, since I haven't watched them), Blish gives it a new twist, something I really enjoyed. In the days following this surprising turn of events, the reader witnesses Kirk, McCoy, and Scotty try to make sense of and attempt to solve this situation. Kirk is particularly stressed out by it, as Spock is not only his First Officer, but his friend, as well. He is especially dismayed when one of the Spocks -- the one Kirk has decided to call "Spock Two" -- almost immediately demands that the other Spock be destroyed, as he claims that "Spock One" is the replicate.
In my honest opinion, this could have turned out to be a truly magnificent novel, had it only been longer. The conflict between the two Spocks could have been developed much further than it actually was, thus creating more drama. Moreover, we could have gotten more information about Mr. Spock's psyche -- the human as well as the Vulcan side. I would have really appreciated it if Blish had delved deeper into the psychological aspects of the story.
As
all Star Trek TOS fans are aware, Mr. Spock remains the show's most
fascinating and intriguing character, because of the contradictions
inherent in his unique personality. These contradictions can often be a
source of frustration, as well as humor, to the humans surrounding him,
but they are also a source of inner torment to the Vulcan himself.
Having two versions of this character at hand could have created a LOT
of interesting situations between the two versions. This could also have
created a LOT more havoc with the crew than it actually did -- not to
mention the Klingons. Unfortunately, Blish did not fully avail himself
of the opportunity to do so....
This whole thing is taking place at the same time that a war -- started by the Klingons -- is going on. This war was also not dealt with adequately. The Organians had previously put a stop to any hostilities between the Federation and the Klingons, in the TV episode mentioned above. The Organians are somewhat incapacitated in this novel, but still, I do think the author could have come up with some way for them to intervene, in spite of what was going on (which I won't go into, so as not give out any spoilers).
The original series -- and I'm sure the subsequent versions were, as well -- has always been very cerebral. I, for one, was totally fascinated by all the scientific explanations that were included in this novel, even though the whole tachyon thing remains a scientific theory, at best.
Here are some samples:
(Scotty speaking) "Suppose we were to redesign the transporter so that, instead of scannin' a man an' replicatin' him at destination in his normal state, it replicated him in tachyons, at this end of the process?"(page 14)
(Scotty again) "After I got the report from Dr. McCoy about the amino acids, I took the assumption one radical step further. I assumed that the mirroring went all the way down to the elementary particles of which space-time and energy-matter are made. Why not? The universe is complicated, but it is consistent." (page 71)
(McCoy speaking) "All this reminded me that though we -- humanity, that is -- know the elementary particles of matter and energy, know the unit of gravity, have even (so Scotty tells me) identified something called the chronon which is the smallest possible bit into which time can be divided, we do not know the elementary unit of consciousness. We do not even know the speed of thought." (page 73)
However, this being a novel, and not a scientific treatise, I repeat that Blish should have developed the plot further, making the book longer, so as to create more dramatic tension in the story. The ending, for example, was a bit too facile, as well as contrived.
This is still a solid piece of ST TOS fiction that is strictily canon. The characters all speak and act as they did in the original episodes. The one little quibble I have, which has been mentioned by other reviewers, is that McCoy is referred to as "Doc" throughout this novel, by all the other characters. All of us fans know very well that Kirk's nickname for McCoy is "Bones". Yet, in this book, Kirk never used this nickname. Instead, he called the doctor "Doc", like everyone else in the crew depicted in this book.
All in all, this is an excellent, if somewhat flawed, addition to the Star Trek TOS universe. The writing is superb, however, which is why I cannot in good conscience give this book less than 4 stars. And I do recommend it to every dedicated Trekker out there! Furthermore, it certainly made me nostalgic for the original episodes..... I need to set aside a weekend for a Star Trek TOS marathon!
Live long and prosper, fellow Terrans!!
MY RATING:
